Westborough Legislators Urge Pause on Amazon Drone Delivery Proposal

(BOSTON 9/29/2026) — This week, three Massachusetts legislators representing Westborough sent a letter to Amazon urging the commercial giant to engage in a more robust community dialogue and to better address residents’ concerns about its proposed Amazon Prime Air drone delivery service – the first of its kind in the Commonwealth. Echoing the hundreds of constituents who attended the company’s September 23rd community meeting to express their serious questions about the noise, safety, and privacy concerns that overhead drones raise, the legislators asked the company to pause its implementation plans in Westborough until it fully addresses these questions. Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury), Representative Hannah Kane (R-Shrewsbury), and Representative Kate Donaghue (D-Westborough) highlight that Amazon has for years operated its facility in the town with the trust and support of the community, and urge Amazon to addresses the concerns of their constituents before moving forward.

Planned to operate out of the company’s existing 200,000 square foot Otis Street fulfillment center, Amazon says Prime Air would be able to deliver items under 5lbs to Westborough and 15 surrounding communities in as little as 30 minutes using its fleet of commercial drones. Amazon states that it hopes to eventually make up to 1,000 deliveries per day to addresses within a 7.5-mile radius of its fulfillment center.

“There is a distinct difference between operating delivery trucks on our neighborhood streets and flying dozens of camera-equipped drones in the skies above our homes. The people who live in these communities have important questions about how Amazon plans to operate its drones safely, quietly, and in a way that respects their privacy – and so far, many of these questions remain unanswered,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “Amazon’s footprint in Westborough has been a net positive for the town and surrounding communities, but the fulfillment center’s success is the result of a strong and ongoing partnership with its neighbors and local officials. On its current path, Amazon Prime Air threatens this partnership by violating this trust the company has built. I hope that Amazon will take the time to listen to the concerns of residents and thoughtfully address them so that we can continue this partnership with trust and mutual respect long into the future.”

"Prime Air's potential impact on the quality of life in Central Massachusetts is a concern I share with my constituents and legislative colleagues,” stated Representative Hannah Kane (R-Shrewsbury). "Shrewsbury and Westborough residents have been clear in their reservations about how these drones will affect their privacy and noise levels in their neighborhoods, as well as safety and environmental issues. People living in communities within Amazon's range need to be able to trust that their questions will be answered, and I urge Amazon to listen to residents and address these issues before moving forward."

“Westborough residents are concerned about noise levels, privacy, safety and more. Reports from people living near launch areas in other parts of the country indicate significant issues regarding noise. Many residents have expressed serious concerns regarding the environmental impact of drones on wildlife, especially birds,” said Representative Kate Donaghue (D-Westborough). “I am hopeful that Amazon will continue to be a good partner to the people of Westborough and the surrounding area.” 

Amazon Prime Air currently operates in 13 cities in 10 states, but the company has laid out an aggressive expansion roadmap that intends to serve over 500 communities with drone delivery by the end of the year. Prime Air drones typically fly up to 74 miles per hour and cruise to their destination at between 205 and 370 feet above the ground, before descending to 13 feet to drop the package on the customer’s property. Amazon states that the drones are loudest during takeoff and landing, but that the sound at cruising altitude is comparable to an electric toothbrush held at arm’s length when heard outdoors.

Designed to operate in wind, rain, and snow, Prime Air drones are said to include redundant propellers that can keep them airborne if one fails. They are equipped with cameras for navigation and collision avoidance, but Amazon claims that all image data is encrypted and that Amazon does not sell or commercially collect data from its flights. These technologies have not proven infallible, however – videos online show Prime Air drones dropping a package into a pool and crashing into a residential apartment building. Additionally, news reports from Texas and Nebraska highlight resident complaints about disruptive noise, with one nearby homeowner likening the constant sound of the drones to a beehive.

Amazon faces a number of hurdles before it can begin launching Prime Air drones in Central Massachusetts. The FAA approved Amazon’s permit to operate delivery drones beyond a visual line of sight nationally in 2024, though a recent legal challenge brought by 15 US states may complicate this blanket permit. Locally, Amazon must receive approval from the Westborough Planning Board before it can begin drone delivery operations. A September 15th Planning Board meeting began the process, though the dialogue will continue into the Board’s October 6th meeting. On permitting, the letter warns, “a federal permit does not reflect the community’s trust and support.”

At the company’s September 23rd community meeting, residents expressed concerns about a range of impacts Prime Air drones could have on the area, including noise, frequency of flights, flight paths, operating hours, privacy, safety, drone cybersecurity, and environmental impacts. Though Amazon has made efforts to reach out to government officials and their constituents about Prime Air, the letter emphasizes that confusion remains about the intended scope of the company’s operations. “It is unfair to expect the community to fairly evaluate a proposal when key details remain undetermined,” Moore, Kane, and Donaghue write.

“The approach undertaken by Amazon here will set the tone for future Amazon expansions in Massachusetts and the greater New England region,” the letter states. “We urge Amazon to address these concerns raised by our constituents before moving forward.”

The full letter can be found online here.

###

Massachusetts Legislature Acts to Protect Free Expression, Guard Against Book Bans

(BOSTON 8/12/2026) — The Massachusetts Legislature on July 31st took action to protect freedom of thought and expression in Massachusetts schools and public libraries and safeguard open access to books and other educational materials. The bill, S.2696 – An Act regarding free expression, was signed into law by Governor Maura Healey yesterday.

As school and public libraries nationally are increasingly faced with politically-charged debates over banning access to particular library books, the bill clear guidelines for how schools and libraries decide which books to make available, and how local leaders determine whether a book is appropriate or should be removed from the shelf.

“Massachusetts has long led the nation in education and a big part of that is our abundance of information; if you are curious about the world around you, our public libraries will have a book where you can learn all about it — even if the subject is controversial. This legislation protects this freedom of thought while creating structured processes for how we decide whether a book is appropriate or not,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “At a time when book bans are being enacted across the nation, Massachusetts is acting to protect the most basic rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution: freedom of speech, freedom of information, and freedom of expression. I am proud to have voted to approve this bipartisan bill because our constitutional rights are and will always be worth fighting for.”

The details of the legislation are below.

Sets Expectations for School Library Materials. Ensures students have free and open access to library books and other school library materials by establishing clear standards for library teachers and other employees to follow as they select school library materials. Requires that school library materials be age-appropriate, serve an educational purpose, and be chosen based on a teacher or employee’s professional training—leaving aside any of their own personal, political, or doctrinal views that could affect whether or not they place the book on the shelf.

Requires Local Districts to Craft Policies. Requires all school districts, charter schools, and local education agencies to adopt their own policies on how to select library materials. All policies must align with American Library Association standards. Directs the Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners and the Massachusetts Library System to share sample policies and make resources available to help local school committees and other school library administrators create or revise their own policies.

Sets the Threshold for Removing a Book. Guards against spurious or unfounded challenges to school library books by keeping a book in question on the shelves unless and until a public hearing process has taken place and the appropriate authority has voted to remove it. Limits who can initiate a challenge to school staff, parents or guardians, and students. Standardizes a patchwork of local practices by laying out the process for authorities to respond to a book challenge and prescribing the threshold that must be met for an authority to remove it. After publishing a notice and holding a public hearing, a review committee of local school personnel would decide whether the material is devoid of educational, literary, artistic, personal, or social value, or whether the material is not age-appropriate for any student. The local school committee would then vote on whether to remove the challenged material. A student, parent, or guardian could contest the school committee’s decision to remove library materials by challenging the decision in court.

Offers Assistance to Municipal Public Libraries. Directs the Board of Library Commissioners to provide resources to assist local public libraries in developing policies that cover the selection and use of library materials, the development of library collections, and the process to respond to any challenges to remove or restrict access to books and other materials. Requires such policies to include a statement that library materials shall not be selected, proscribed, or removed based on personal, political, or doctrinal disapproval or bias.

Provides Opportunities for Appeals. Allows authors, creators, and residents of the city or town to appeal decisions to remove materials from the city or town’s local public library. The appeals would be filed in Superior Court.

Holds Librarians Harmless. Protects school employees and public librarians from professional, civil, or criminal penalties based on their selection of library materials. Prohibits the revocation of professional certification or department-issued professional license on the basis of the employee’s selection of library materials, provided that the decision was made in good faith and in accordance with the school’s library materials policy. Prohibits the local district from taking other adverse actions against the employee for such professional decisions, including dismissal, discipline, probation, or involuntary transfer.

Collects Data from Schools and Public Libraries. Requires the Board of Library Commissioners to collect data on challenges to books and other educational materials in libraries around the state and file an annual report with the Legislature. Requires school districts, charter schools, and local education agencies to submit a report to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) on challenges to school library materials, and the outcomes of those challenges.

Having been passed in the House and the Senate, and having been signed by the Governor, the bill is now law.

###

Massachusetts Legislature Passes Landmark Child Welfare Bill

(BOSTON 8/11/2026) — On Friday, Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey signed comprehensive legislation to strengthen oversight, transparency, and accountability within the Commonwealth’s child welfare system. Passed by the Legislature in late July, H.5629 – An Act Enhancing Child Welfare Protections strengthens and builds on the work of existing entities including the Office of the Child Advocate (OCA), the Department of Children and Families (DCF), the Family Resource Center (FRC) network and the Commonwealth’s public schools in order to take a comprehensive approach toward making sure all children receive the support they deserve.

“We owe it to the children of Massachusetts to ensure they receive the very best care and are protected by the full force of our laws. This bill makes meaningful changes to advance the safety and protection for children in our foster care system and beyond,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “While this bill could’ve gone further- especially by including my comprehensive youth vision screening proposal which was adopted in the Senate’s version- these updated policies will have a real and lasting impact on the lives of the Commonwealth’s most vulnerable. I’d like to thank my colleagues for their hard work on this issue, and I look forward to continuing our efforts to give each and every child in Massachusetts the support they need to achieve their greatest potential.”

A key achievement of Senator Moore in the final legislation is the inclusion of a policy creating a multi-agency Foster Student Educational Achievement Working Group. Championed by Moore during Senate debate on the bill, the Working Group’s primary goal is to create regulations governing the timelines and processes for how students in the custody of DCF will have their educational records transferred between schools when they are placed in a new home. The Working Group is set to be made up of representatives from state government, education, mental health organizations, and child advocacy organizations, and must submit its proposal on the implementation of the educational record transfer policy by December 1st, 2026.

This legislation provides for the establishment of a DCF Education Unit, to be led by an Education Director and staffed with Education Specialists tasked with academic monitoring, support, and coordination with school districts. It also requires that DCF and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) establish clear enrollment timelines and record transfer standards for children in DCF custody who move schools to avoid further interruptions to their education. Additionally, this bill establishes a commission to make recommendations on the creation and implementation of a digital education portfolio system to support the timely transfer of educational records.

This bill creates a Foster Child Bill of Rights to clarify and protect the basic rights and services foster children need to live healthy, safe and fulfilled lives. It also codifies a Youth Engagement program within the OCA to ensure the voices of youth are included to inform relevant policy, oversight and programs. Additionally, the bill allows a child the same ability as an adult to petition the court to extend any abuse or harassment protection order made on behalf of the child.

The legislation also helps keep kids out of the justice system by increasing the diversion of children with behavioral or truancy issues to FRCs. These changes to the Child Requiring Assistance (CRA) process will help ensure children and their families receive the services and support they need, rather than involve them in the court system.

In addition, this bill expands statutory reporting by DCF to include disability and intersectional demographics, breakdowns of 51A reports by reporter role, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodation and complaint metrics, and refined placement and permanency measures. It also adds reporting outcomes of youth as they age out of DCF’s care, behavioral health boarding, and education metrics, such as individualized education program counts, attendance, and graduation rates. Additionally, it requires timely notification from DCF to a child’s attorney for certain emergency situations like arrest, expulsion, hospitalization or 51A reports of child abuse or neglect.

The bill also strengthens the independence of the Office of the Child Advocate as an autonomous state agency. It further expands the OCA’s authority to examine systemic disproportionalities, partner with agencies while safeguarding its oversight role, maintain a public website for mandated reporters, and conduct systemwide reviews of DCF. The legislation further strengthens the OCA’s ability to publicly share critical incident reports, allowing for greater public accountability and transparency.

In addition, the bill transfers leadership of the Child Fatality Review System from DCF to a co-chairmanship of the OCA and the Department of Public Health (DPH). It further expands membership to include the Department of Early Education and Care (EEC) and codifies the structure of local review teams.

Lastly, it tasks the OCA with supporting families and caregivers by providing training materials to mandated reporters and individuals who frequently work with children. Inspired by a family’s story, it also tasks the OCA with creating and maintaining a list of resources for grieving parents who have experienced a sudden unexplained pediatric death.

Having passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, and having received the signature of the Governor, the bill is now law.

###

Legislators Urge Governor to Limit Government Purchases of Products Containing PFAS

(BOSTON 8/10/2026) — Last week, 48 Massachusetts state legislators sent a letter to the office of Governor Maura Healey requesting that she issue an executive order meant to limit PFAS-containing products within government buildings and agencies. The letter asks the Governor to require executive office agencies stop purchasing products made with PFAS chemicals if there are PFAS-free alternatives available on the market, extending the Commonwealth’s efforts to reduce public exposure to dangerous “forever chemicals” while setting an example for individuals and companies who may be unaware that safer products exist.

The legislators’ request comes two years after the signing of S.2902 – An Act relative to the reduction of certain toxic chemicals in firefighter personal protective equipment, which creates the framework for the elimination of new firefighter turnout gear containing PFAS from Massachusetts firehouses by 2027. Introduced and championed by Second Worcester District Senator Michael Moore, the bill establishes a legal definition for “intentionally added PFAS,” a definition the Governor can cite in an executive order.

“The science is in – PFAS chemicals are dangerous and linked to dozens of short- and long-term health risks. The question is, what are we going to do about it?” said Senator Moore (D-Millbury). “I’m thrilled that 47 of my colleagues have joined me in urging Governor Healey to use her power to reduce exposure to PFAS in government buildings across the Commonwealth. By banning our departments and agencies from purchasing products containing these ‘forever chemicals,’ Massachusetts has the opportunity to help drive the growing market for safer products and to show Bay Staters that choosing safer alternatives doesn’t have to be hard or expensive. I’m grateful for the support we have received from environmental activists and health advocates in this fight, and I’m hopeful that the Governor will continue her leadership on this issue.”

PFAS, or Polyfluoroalkyl substances, is a class designation that includes nearly 10,000 chemicals used to make everyday items fireproof, waterproof, or non-stick. These chemicals have become ubiquitous in products ranging from cookware to furniture to food and drink containers despite posing dangerous health risks. Even at low levels, the toxicity of PFAS chemicals can be devastating, increasing the risk of cancer, immunosuppression, birth defects, colitis, and other diseases. Compounding these dangers is the persistent nature of PFAS chemicals, known as “forever chemicals” for their resistance to breaking down in the environment.

The letter argues, “To enact the best public health practices, it is crucial that Massachusetts, a state that makes evidence-based policy decisions, takes action to restrict PFAS exposure. Adopting PFAS-free purchasing would increase public awareness on the matter, while we work towards finding and developing PFAS-free alternatives to common products.” Pointing to cities and towns like Newton, Brookline, and Middleborough which have already enacted similar procurement bans, the legislators suggest that the precedent for this action is set.

The movement to limit government purchases of PFAS-containing products is not new – over 50 Massachusetts environmental advocacy organizations sent a letter with a similar request to Governor Healey’s office in February 2025. They highlight that the molecular strength of PFAS-class chemicals causes them to accumulate in soil and water, where they can remain for decades without breaking down. Direct pollution from industrial waste and firefighting foam, as well as unintentional releases from landfills, can contaminate drinking water sources – a problem Massachusetts is spending millions of dollars attempting to remediate.

Governor Healey herself has shown concern about PFAS contamination in the Bay State. The legislators’ letter points out that in 2022 as Attorney General, she filed a class action lawsuit against 13 PFAS manufacturers for polluting the state’s drinking water and damaging its natural resources. Litigation on the case is still ongoing.

17 senators and 31 representatives signed this week’s letter urging action at the highest level of Massachusetts government. The full letter, including the list of signatories, can be found online here.

###

Legislature Approves PROTECT Act, Defending Residents from Federal Overreach

(BOSTON 8/6/2026) — The Massachusetts Legislature last week passed sweeping legislation to protect residents from overreach by federal immigration authorities and to ensure that local and state law enforcement are not involved in federal immigration enforcement. Signed into law yesterday by Governor Maura Healey, the legislation creates among the strongest protections in the nation for residents who have immigrated to their communities.

The final bill, An Act promoting rule of law, oversight, trust and equal constitutional treatment – known as the PROTECT Act – strengthens due process protections; limits civil immigration enforcement in courthouses, public school grounds, hospitals, and other sensitive locations; expands protections for victims of crime; and increases transparency, accountability, and clarity for correctional facilities and law enforcement relative to civil immigration enforcement. The PROTECT Act was originally filed by the Black and Latino Legislative Caucus, with the goal of offering feasible policy options to address growing concerns about federal overreach in Massachusetts.

“The President was elected on platform of using ICE to go after ‘worst of the worst,’ but in cities and towns across America, we’re seeing indiscriminate and unconstitutional overreach by federal agents – terrorizing neighborhoods, splitting families, and hurting trust in Government to do the right thing,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “The PROTECT Act maintains the ability of our local law enforcement here in Massachusetts to protect our communities while ensuring state resources are not used to harass and disappear our neighbors. By taking a stand against the cruelest actions we’ve seen from agencies like ICE and Border Patrol, this bill will help keep families together, strengthen trust in local police, and protect Bay Staters in schools, hospitals, and places of worship. Although we have more to do, I’m proud that we’re taking these important steps toward making the Commonwealth a safer and more secure place to live for all.”

Highlights of the legislation are detailed below.

FOSTERING TRUST BETWEEN RESIDENTS AND THEIR COMMUNITIES

Prohibits New 287(g) Agreements. Bars Massachusetts law enforcement agencies from signing new deputization agreements with federal immigration authorities, except in narrow, criminal-law-focused arrangements that meet additional safeguards.

Enhances Protections at Sensitive Locations. Bars civil immigration arrests without a judicial warrant at schools, childcare centers, medical facilities, and courthouses. The Governor may also restrict enforcement activity in non-public areas of state buildings and state agencies, private organizations. The public will receive multilingual guidance on responding to enforcement encounters, confirming an officer's credentials, and understanding their rights.

Permits Pre-Arrangement of Guardianship. Lets parents designate a guardian for their children in advance, so a plan is already in place if a family is separated by detention or deportation.

 

ENSURING EQUAL TREATMENT UNDER THE CONSTITUTION

Creates a Pathway for Justice for Civil Rights Violations. Establishes a civil cause of action against federal officers who violate a resident's constitutional rights, putting them under the same accountability standards as state and local police.

Protects Residents from Discrimination. Bars police from asking about a person's immigration status or stopping them because of it, absent a connection to a specific criminal matter.

 

OVERSEEING A FOCUSED LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM

Prohibits State and Municipal Participation in Immigration Enforcement. Keeps state and local police out of federal civil immigration enforcement, barring the use of local resources for that purpose, or detention, based solely on a civil immigration detainer.

Preserves Authority to Investigate and Prosecute Crime. Makes clear that officers can still pursue criminal investigations, share information tied to a criminal case, coordinate with federal partners on matters unrelated to civil immigration enforcement, and comply with a valid judicial warrant or court order.

Provides Oversight Authority to the State Auditor. Gives the State Auditor authority to review sheriffs' agreements with federal immigration agencies and any immigration detention facilities operating in the Commonwealth.

 

 

UPHOLDING THE RULE OF LAW

Supports Victims of Crime. Protects immigrant crime victims, including trafficking survivors, who assist law enforcement as witnesses, and speeds up review of their special visa applications so they can keep participating in investigations or trials.

Establishes Local Custody Protections. Requires county and state correctional facilities to notify people in custody, in writing, of their rights, including access to counsel and the right to decline interviews; keep a confidential phone line open for calls with an attorney; publish a number the public can use to confirm whether and where someone is detained; and log every access request and disclosure for at least a year.

 

NOTIFICATION OF WORKERS’ RIGHTS

Advance Notification to Employees. Requires employers to inform employees of receiving a notice of inspection by ICE to verify employment eligibility verification and other employment records.

 

Having been signed by the Governor, the bill is now law.

###

Massachusetts Senate Votes to Expand Public Records Law to Legislature, Governor

(BOSTON 8/4/2026) — The Massachusetts Senate last week passed legislation that increases residents’ access to information about how decisions are made inside the Legislature and the Governor’s office, along with critical free press protections that allow journalists to protect their sources. For the first time, the bill writes into the state public records law that the public has a right to know about key legislative records, such as vote tallies, salaries of elected officials and staff, ethics disclosures, operating expenditures, and contracts.

The legislation – S.3200, An Act promoting transparency and public access in state government – also opens up access to records created by the Office of the Governor. The transparency measure has earned the support of several groups who advocate for greater access to government and the promotion of democracy, including the Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association, Common Cause Massachusetts, and the ACLU of Massachusetts.

“Transparency should be at the heart of a government that is of, by, and for the people. With the passage of this legislation, the Senate is taking steps to move Beacon Hill’s historically opaque processes out into the open – giving you more insight into how decisions are made and how your tax dollars are spent,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “I have been a strong supporter of greater transparency from the very beginning of my time representing the Second Worcester District because I believe that what happens in the State House is the people’s business. They say that the light of day is the best disinfectant – I’m thrilled that my colleagues have joined me in letting more light shine into the Golden Dome.”

Building on the legislation’s support for freedom of information, Senators voted unanimously during last week’s debate to adopt Amendment 17 guaranteeing legal protections for journalists by allowing them to protect the anonymity of their sources.

The ‘press shield’ provision would prohibit anyone from compelling a journalist to disclose the identity of a confidential source except under certain qualified circumstances.

The underlying transparency bill’s process for members of the public to access legislative records is modeled after the legislative record components of Pennsylvania’s ‘Right-to-Know Law.’

The bill outlines the process for people to request legislative records, including the assurance of an impartial appeals process. A designated staff member in the Senate or in the House would be required to answer a request within 10 days and share any responsive records.

Requestors could appeal any denied requests to the Superior Court, independent of the Legislative or Executive branches of government.

Similarly, people requesting records from the Governor’s office could appeal a decision to the Secretary of the Commonwealth, then to the Superior Court.

The new public records statutes would take effect at the start of the new term in January 2027.

Full details of the bill are available online in a fact sheet in the Senate’s press room.

A previous version was passed by the House of Representatives. Following public debate, the Senate passed the bill on a 34-6 roll call vote and sent it back to the House for further consideration.

###

Senate Passes Economic Development Bill Investing in Housing, Research, Responsible AI

(BOSTON 7/24/2026) — Following two days of debate, the Massachusetts Senate yesterday passed an economic development package that lifts up small businesses and burgeoning industries, bans predatory kiosks used in cryptocurrency scams, and reins in the potential dangers of artificial intelligence by instituting responsible guardrails against catastrophes.

The bill also surges the production of new housing units through automatic two-family zoning across Massachusetts, creates safety rules for fast electric scooters and e-bikes, and invests $100 million in immediate support for scientific research programs at public higher education institutions.

With $575.4 million in authorizations, the economic development bond bill is poised to grow the number of quality jobs in the Commonwealth, support innovation, and improve the quality of life for workers and families.

“While we are seeing signs of sluggish economic growth nationwide, the Senate is stepping up to boost Massachusetts’ economy through targeted investments, thoughtful policy, and strong consumer protections,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “This economic development bill, while not perfect, represents a doubling down on the hardworking Bay Staters who keep our communities moving and reflects the spirit of a state that will continue to lead the nation for years to come. By expanding economic opportunity, supporting jobs, and cutting red tape, we are investing in the communities that we represent – and that’s the very best thing Beacon Hill can do.”

During Senate debate, Senator Moore secured a number of earmarks and amendments for the communities in the Second Worcester District. These include:

  • $5,000,000 for the DCU Center in Worcester to fund building improvements and modernization projects

  • $1,083,000 for the Massachusetts Food Trust Program to expand access to fresh groceries in the City of Worcester

  • $250,000 for Auburn to expand economic opportunities through local priorities

  • $250,000 for Grafton to expand economic opportunities through local priorities

  • $250,000 for Millbury to expand economic opportunities through local priorities

  • $250,000 for Shrewsbury to expand economic opportunities through local priorities

  • $250,000 for Westborough to expand economic opportunities through local priorities

The Senate also adopted Amendment 118, introduced by Senator Moore. Based on his legislation S.1208 – An Act to ensure the responsible use of advanced robotic technologies, this amendment would ban the manufacture, sale, and operation of robots or drones mounted with a weapon. Included in the amendment are narrow exceptions for the United States Military and its contractors, as well as a clarification that law enforcement officers must follow the same warrant framework when utilizing robots or drones to enter a property as they would in human-led investigations. If signed into law, this first-in-the-nation policy would create a blueprint for proactive robotics safety regulations that can be enacted before tragedy strikes.

The Senate also adopted Amendment 94, introduced by Senator Paul Mark, criminalizing the creation, possession, or sharing of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) generated by artificial intelligence. The amendment was supported and co-sponsored by Senator Moore, and shares similar language with his bill S.2633 – An Act relative to AI-generated child sexual abuse material.

While many of Senator Moore’s amendments to the Senate’s bill were adopted, two of his high-priority data center amendments were notably omitted. Amendment 1, if passed, would have temporarily paused the approval or construction of data centers with an energy demand of 20-megawatts or greater until November 2027, while also creating the Massachusetts Data Center Coordination Council to write a report on the costs and benefits of mega data centers on the communities that host them. Amendment 2 would have required that any new or expanded data centers power their operations with 100% renewable energy, and would allow energy companies to charge a tariff on data centers to protect other ratepayers from rate hikes caused by their energy use. Senator Moore withdrew the amendments due to insufficient support.

Senator Moore also vocally opposed Amendment 14, a policy that would significantly raise the bar for when the state’s 62F tax refund provision would trigger. Under the new language, 62F refunds would only be triggered if both net state tax revenues exceed the defined allowable revenues that year and net state tax revenues exceed 7.5% of the total statewide personal income that year. In neither of the two fiscal years 62F was triggered – 1987 and 2022 – would taxpayers have qualified for a refund under the new policy, adopted on a 31-8 roll call vote.

“I am thrilled to have secured earmarks and amendments that will make a real difference to each of the six cities and towns I represent in the Second Worcester District. But while the wins in this legislation stand out, the losses do too,” said Senator Moore. “Bay Staters are struggling with an ever-rising cost of living crisis, and while this legislation makes important investments to help address these challenges, we could’ve done more. My amendments regulating power- and water-hungry data centers failed for the second time in a month, leaving Massachusetts unprotected against AI-driven electricity rate spikes and community disruptions. Further, the Senate approved an amendment that rolls back 62F, a measure the voters approved 40 years ago to ensure unneeded tax revenues are returned to the people. I am disappointed in these omissions, but I remain hopeful that the Legislature will soon act to address these kitchen table issues in a way that benefits the hardworking people of the Commonwealth.”

 

The bill prioritizes bonding investments to boost every aspect of the Massachusetts economy, including:

  • $100 million to support and promote economic growth and job creation in the defense sector;

  • $75 million to support the development and application of AI;

  • $25 million to support downtown and main street vitality in Massachusetts towns and cities, in addition to $2.5 million to help convert vacant storefronts into pop-up opportunities for new small businesses;

  • $25 million for research and development of robotics technology;

  • $20 million to support construction of early stage and high growth business ventures;

  • $20 million to support community development financial institutions and small businesses; and

  • $25 million to support arts, culture, and the creative economy, building on recent successes of the Massachusetts tourism and cultural sector.

The legislation requires major AI developers – known as large frontier developers – to account for their AI models’ risk of critical safety incidents by setting frameworks to avoid potential catastrophes. The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) would be empowered to bring civil lawsuits against major AI developers if they violate these new safety requirements.

The bill would create unprecedented levels of new housing units in Massachusetts by allowing two-family homes on all residentially zoned lots, subject to reasonable local limitations.

Supporting the Massachusetts economy’s workers and their families, the bill goes further to boost the state’s housing stock by creating a new, easier process for converting commercial properties into residential units, and requiring timely review processes for housing construction projects.

Recent e-bike and electric scooter technology has moved beyond older state laws into unregulated territory. This bill accounts for these developments by creating new safety standards that keep young children off these devices, some of which can speed at 30 miles per hour, and banning mopeds and similar devices from bike lanes and shared use paths.

Scientific research drives a significant part of the Massachusetts economy. With federal research funding under threat, the legislation invests an immediate $100 million in bridge funding for public higher education institutions to help maintain the pace of scientific discovery and retain talented graduate and post doctorate workers.

Full details of the legislation as released by the Senate Ways and Means Committee are available in a fact sheet in the Senate’s press room.

Over the course of the past two days, the Senate built on the underlying bill by adopting amendments in critical areas related to responsible technological advancement, the hospitality industry and vibrant business districts, and the ability for certain professions to work across state lines.

Safety in Technological Innovation

Stopping Cryptocurrency ATM Misuse (Amendment 374): Responds to the use of cryptocurrency kiosks as tools in predatory scams by fully banning the operation of such kiosks in Massachusetts. Scammers in recent years have directed older adults to use crypto kiosks to send money which is often not recoverable when the fraud is discovered, leading some seniors to lose their entire life savings.

Frontier AI Risk Reports and Independent Verification (Amendment 471): Verifies that large AI developers are complying with this legislation’s new safety requirements by requiring independent, third-party safety audits. Additionally requires large AI companies to undergo in-depth, independent safety testing every four months to identify any residual catastrophic risks.

Protecting Against CSAM (Amendment 94): Criminalizes the creation, possession, or sharing of AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM), in response to new AI technology and computer programs capable of generating synthetic images that are indistinguishable from real photos. Penalties for sharing such images go up to 10 years imprisonment. Creating or prompting synthetic CSAM is punishable by up to five years in prison, or 10 years if the image depicts a real child.

Responsible Robotics (Amendment 118): Ensures the responsible use of robotics technology. Prohibits the possession, operation, manufacture, or sale of robots that are equipped with weapons—including firearms, chemical agents, weaponized lasers and explosives. Prohibits the use of a robotic device to criminally harass or physically restrain another person. Violations are punishable by up to five years in prison. Includes a waiver process for defense companies and contractors; an exemption for the military; and a process for law enforcement to use weaponized robots to destroy or diffuse bombs, with a proper warrant.

 

The ‘Fun Agenda’

No Soccer No Party (Amendment 595): Convenes a working group to study the feasibility of a future international soccer tournament to be held in Massachusetts. The group, organized under the Office of International Trade and Investment, would study potential dates, venues, operational needs, and funding sources, and would coordinate with representatives of participating countries including the United States, Scotland, and nations with a significant diaspora in Massachusetts.

Making music affordable by reining in predatory ticket scalping (Amendment 20): Institutes a 110 percent cap on prices charged by ticket resale platforms for music concert tickets.

Happy Hour (Amendment 78): Gives cities and towns the option of re-establishing ‘happy hour’ discounted alcohol sales policies, boosting bars, restaurants, and other licensed establishments. Municipalities would regulate happy hours by local ordinance.

Conviviality Districts (Amendment 309): Builds on the success of a historic summer by permanently allowing cities and towns to permit public alcohol consumption in designated outdoor districts. Municipalities would be able to adopt the local-option districts for areas such as streets and parks, with the requirement that drinks be purchased from licensed establishments within the designated area.

Public Arts and Entertainment Microgrant Program (Amendment 354): Authorizes $1 million for a new grant program to boost the cultural and economic vitality of downtown areas, commercial areas, cultural districts, gathering places, and nightlife destinations. The Massachusetts Cultural Council would distribute the microgrants to support public arts, performances, and programming.

Cultivating Agritourism Across Massachusetts (Amendment 70): Authorizes $5 million for grants to support local farms, agriculture, and small businesses through agritourism.

Massport Liquor License Flexibility (Amendment 441): Allows bars and restaurants at Logan Airport to continue serving alcohol as long as flights are arriving and departing from the airport.

 

Networking Jobs Across State Lines

Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (Amendment 11): Increases access to psychology services by adding Massachusetts to an interstate compact that recognizes the licensure of psychologists in other participating states. Allows licensed psychologists from those states to practice via telehealth across state lines.

Social Work Licensure Compact (Amendment 222): Supports Massachusetts social workers by joining surrounding states in the social work licensure compact, ensuring they can continue to care for patients in other states.

Establishing a Physical Therapy Compact (Amendment 402): Bolsters the physical therapy workforce by working toward the creation of an interstate compact, which would allow licensed physical therapists and assistants to practice across participating state lines.

 

Fostering a Strong Local and Regional Economy

Juvenile Jurisdiction (Amendment 495): Raises the age of juvenile jurisdiction to include residents who are 18 years old. The ‘raise the age’ initiative is proven to decrease crime, increase public safety and improve economic outcomes by allowing emerging adults who are 18 years old—the typical age of a high school senior—to be tried as juveniles instead of adults for certain crimes.

Requiring Automated Criminal Record Sealing (Amendment 511): Automates and expedites the process of sealing criminal records, ensuring that eligible people are able to move forward without bureaucratic delays.

Affordable Homeownership Pilot (Amendment 46): Supports the development and construction of permanently affordable homeownership units by aiding the creation of a pilot program. Authorizes $2.5 million to fund the creation of units for low- and moderate-income households, including units within mixed-use developments.

Municipal Tax Relief (Amendment 554): Gives cities and towns the option of providing enhanced tax relief in the form of a rebate to lower- and middle-income taxpayers who already receive the residential tax exemption. Creates an additional tool on top of the established residential exemption, which gives property tax relief to local residents by shifting more of the residential tax burden onto vacation homes and investment properties.

West-East Passenger Rail (Amendment 196): Authorizes $5 million for the development of the passenger rail station in Palmer, a key stop for West-East Passenger Rail to span the state from Boston to Pittsfield.

The ENOUGH Act (Amendment 401): Creates a fund and framework to capitalize on public-private partnerships to lift families and communities out of poverty. Support would extend to community organizations to boost areas such as early education and care, affordable housing, public safety, and civic infrastructure.

Zoo New England (Amendment 22): Authorizes $5 million for capital improvements at facilities of Zoo New England, which supports education and conservation through the Franklin Park Zoo in Boston and Stone Memorial Zoo in Stoneham.

Massachusetts National Guard Museum Birthplace (Amendment 366): Unlocks federal dollars to support the development of the Massachusetts National Guard Museum by giving an official designation to the museum. Designates the facility’s location as Salem, the birthplace of the National Guard where the first muster of the colonial Militia was held 389 years ago.

 

The package is based on legislation originally filed by Governor Maura Healey. A prior version was passed by the House of Representatives.

The Senate passed the bill and sent it back to the House of Representatives for further consideration.

###

Senate Passes Bill Bolstering Security Protocols and Support for Health Care Employees

(BOSTON 7/17/2026) — The Massachusetts Senate acted yesterday to support the safety of frontline health care workers by improving vital security protocols at hospitals and doctors’ offices across the state.

Responding to a troubling spate of violent incidents, the Senate’s legislation would require annual reviews of security protocols and potential risks at health care facilities.

The legislation passed by the Senate, S.3171, also helps law enforcement make timely arrests for assaults at health care facilities, extends new supports to health care employees who are assaulted on the job, and shields victims’ personal information from assailants.

“Reports of violence against nurses and doctors who are assaulted while doing their jobs are coming in from across the Commonwealth. The statistics are staggering – a healthcare worker is assaulted once every 36 minutes, according to one estimate,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “This must end. I’m proud that the Senate is taking steps to strengthen protections for healthcare workers and allow our police to more rapidly respond to violence in hospitals. Doctors and nurses have some of the hardest jobs in our society – it is on us to ensure they can focus on caring for their patients. I’m hopeful that the House will join us to get this important legislation to Governor Healey’s desk as soon as possible.”

Nearly seven out of 10 nurses report having experienced an assault in the workplace, according to data shared by the Massachusetts Nurses Association, 1199SEIU, and the Massachusetts Health and Hospital Association.

The Senate bill backs up law enforcement officers who respond to those incidents by allowing timely, warrantless arrests for line-of-duty assault and battery on a health care employee. This reasonable use of a warrantless arrest, in situations where the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect committed the assault, is similar to existing exceptions to allow timely arrests in domestic violence cases.

Supporting health care employees who are assaulted on the job, the bill requires employers to offer paid leave that covers an employee’s time seeking medical treatment and aiding in the prosecution of their attacker. It would also shield the victim’s personal, residential address on criminal complaints.

Full details of the bill are available in a fact sheet in the Senate’s press room.

Having been passed in the Senate, the bill now goes to the House of Representatives for further consideration.

###

Capital Grants Awarded to Two Worcester Employment-Focused Organizations

(BOSTON 7/16/2026) — This week, the Healey-Driscoll Administration announced the FY27 recipients of the Executive Office of Economic Development’s Social Enterprise Capital Grant Program, including two Worcester-based organizations. Latin American Health Alliance and Regional Environmental Council will receive $250,000 and $100,000 respectively in support of their employment and supportive service programs for individuals who face significant barriers to workforce participation.

The Social Capital Grant Program is focused on supporting nonprofit organizations across the Commonwealth that sell goods and services while providing employment opportunities and job training for people who might otherwise struggle to find jobs through traditional avenues. The grants are competitive one-year capital grants that offer funding to purchase, renovate, repair, or remodel buildings to be used by the awarded organization.

“Latin American Health Alliance and Regional Environmental Council are both exceptional organizations that offer job opportunities to people who otherwise might not have them, helping them develop skills and build their resumes through real, fulfilling work,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “I’m pleased that the Governor and her administration recognize the value of these organizations’ work and have awarded them grants that will allow them to continue their mission. Worcester and the entire Central Massachusetts region are better off for it.”

"Local organizations like the Regional Environmental Council and the Latin American Health Alliance lift up our community through the work they do, including providing individuals the opportunity to make meaningful contributions to their community and gain workforce skills," said Senator Robyn Kennedy (D-Worcester). "Thank you to the Governor and the Executive Office of Economic Development for recognizing and supporting the efforts of these organizations and the lasting impact they make on the people they serve."

Latin American Health Alliance is set to receive $250,000 to support renovations and equipment upgrades at Café Reyes, the organization’s mission-based restaurant and catering social enterprise. Café Reyes serves Cuban and Latin American food while providing paid work experience and job training for residents and graduates of the Hector Reyes House, a bilingual and bicultural residential treatment program for Latino men in recovery. Grant funds will be used to modernize the commercial kitchen, upgrade aging infrastructure, and purchase industry standard equipment needed to expand production capacity, training space, and operational efficiency.

Regional Environmental Council will receive $100,000 to support the renovation of first-floor social enterprise and workforce development space for its food justice and urban agriculture operations. REC operates community and mobile farmers markets, urban growing programs, and YouthGROW, a youth employment and urban agriculture program that connects Worcester residents with fresh, affordable local food. The renovated space will support market operations and expand employee roles while strengthening the link between workforce development, environmental stewardship, and equitable food access.

According to the Social Enterprise Capital Grant webpage, “an employment social enterprise is defined as a discrete or embedded business venture operated by a mission-driven nonprofit organization with programming focused on hiring and assisting people who face barriers to employment.” To be eligible to apply, “the organization must offer paid employment opportunities to low-income individuals, with priority to socially and economically disadvantaged populations who experience complex needs and barriers to employment that require intensive interventions.”

FY27 grant applications opened on April 1, 2026 and were accepted through May 5, 2026.

###

Massachusetts Senate Cracks Down on Social Media Companies

(BOSTON 7/10/2026) — The Massachusetts Senate stood up to big social media companies yesterday by passing legislation that reins in how their platforms’ most addictive features target young people. The bill, S.3164 – An Act protecting children from addictive social media feeds, was unanimously advanced by the Senate Committee on Advanced Information Technology, the Internet and Cybersecurity in July 2025, chaired by Second Worcester District Senator Michael Moore.

The bill cracks down on settings that are engineered to keep minors perpetually on social media platforms at the expense of the health and wellbeing of users. Features such as autoplay, ‘infinite scroll,’ and intrusive algorithms that capitalize on users’ personal data would be turned off by default for minors. Minors would not be able to change those default settings, while adult users would retain control over their own settings.

“Trillion-dollar social media companies are preying on our kids’ developing brains by building addictive algorithms and unhealthy features meant to keep them from logging off. These manipulative techniques, many borrowed from companies that build slot machines, are intentionally designed to create lifelong users who Silicon Valley can sell ads to without any regard for the child’s mental health,” said Senator Moore (D-Millbury). “With the passage of this legislation, we are making it clear that these greedy corporations will no longer put their bottom line over the health and well-being of Massachusetts’ kids. I’m proud to have worked with lead sponsor Senator Cynthia Stone Creem alongside my colleagues on the Senate Committee on Advanced Information Technology, the Internet and Cybersecurity to strengthen this bill’s protections, ensuring that social media platforms operate with safety at the forefront. It is incredibly important that Beacon Hill is taking these important steps for our children, and I look forward to going even further to protect the people of the Commonwealth from Big Tech’s greed with the landmark Massachusetts Data Privacy Act.”

Studies have linked prolonged daily social media use to increased depression and anxiety in children.

The legislation includes added optional safeguards for children, such as limits on the ability of ‘non-friend’ accounts – strangers – to contact minors’ accounts.

Senators voted during debate to adopt an amendment (Amendment 24) that adds mandatory protection for minors’ precise location data. As amended, the bill now requires that social media platforms cannot allow minor children to share their precise locations with others.

“This legislation sends a clear message that children’s wellbeing must come before social media companies’ bottom line,” said Senate Majority Leader Cynthia Stone Creem (D-Newton). “Features like autoplay, infinite scroll, and algorithm-driven feeds are intentionally designed to keep young people online for as long as possible, often at the expense of their mental health. This bill takes thoughtful steps to create a safer online experience for children while protecting privacy and free speech. I’m grateful to Senate President Spilka for her leadership and to everyone whose partnership helped bring us to this moment. I’m proud the Senate has acted on this important issue, and I look forward to continuing our work to protect children online.”

The bill was open to a public feedback process last year by the Joint Committee on Advanced Information Technology, the Internet and Cybersecurity. It was unanimously advanced with a favorable recommendation on July 24th, 2025.

“Big Tech companies have for decades lobbied to ensure that they remain unaccountable for the harm they inflict on our youth – but here in the Commonwealth, a reckoning for has arrived,” Senator Moore added.

Full details of the legislation are available in a fact sheet in the Senate’s press room.

The Senate passed the bill on a 38-2 roll call vote and sent it to the House of Representatives for further consideration.

###

Senator Michael Moore Objects to Senate’s Inadequate Energy Bill

(BOSTON 7/6/2026) — On Wednesday, the Massachusetts Senate passed a broad piece of legislation intended to help reduce monthly energy costs for Massachusetts ratepayers. While the bill, S.3143 – An Act to save people money, repair the climate, and grow the economy, is projected to save Bay Staters $14 billion, the Senate’s calculation is made over a 10-year period and would not deliver significant savings to families in the immediate term. For that reason, Second Worcester District Senator Michael Moore joined a bipartisan group of eight senators in voting no.

The legislation passed by the Senate this week finds savings in three broad ways; adjusting investment plans, pursuing investigations, and creating new infrastructure initiatives. The first method pledges savings by canceling or altering investments in infrastructure projects, such as reducing the scope of the Commonwealth’s Gas System Enhancement Plan ($1.46 billion) and restructuring infrastructure debt incurred by utilities ($7.1 billion). The next approach projects theoretical savings borne by investigations into wrongdoing, including investigating markups on electric bills (up to $1 billion), reviewing hidden charges ($750 million), and cracking down on energy suppliers ($650 million). The final plan creates new programs to streamline renewable energy projects, such as cutting red tape on permitting ($1.7 billion) and subsidizing consumer-level solar and battery projects ($540 million). While Senator Moore supports many of these initiatives, the bill as written prioritizes future-facing policy without addressing ratepayers who are struggling with their utility bills today.

“The people of Massachusetts send us to Beacon Hill to address their challenges and make their lives easier. My office continues to receive countless emails and phone calls from constituents struggling with the high cost of energy on a daily basis. Legislation that bills itself as a cost-saving measure but that only yields tangible savings years down the road is legislation that does not meet this moment,” said Senator Moore (D-Millbury). “It is certainly no secret that the Commonwealth is facing a cost-of-living crisis, and that long-term thinking can help tame future rate increases – that is not my objection – but people in Central Massachusetts and across this state are struggling to pay their utility bills today. We must do more to deliver policy that will bring relief to ratepayers in months, not years.”

“Senator Moore is exactly right: families and local businesses across the Commonwealth are facing a severe cost-of-living crisis right now, and they cannot afford to wait a decade for theoretical relief. While we support long-term carbon reduction goals, this legislation fails to protect ratepayers from the immediate, crushing financial burdens of the energy transition,” said Jeannie Hebert, President of the Blackstone Valley Chamber of Commerce. “I applaud Senator Moore for standing up for a common-sense, all-of-the-above energy strategy that balances environmental innovation with real, immediate economic affordability and infrastructure reliability.”

“Achieving true energy affordability for the Commonwealth requires a responsible, 'all-of-the-above' energy strategy. Unfortunately, the Senate’s Bill fails to address the root causes of our skyrocketing energy bills and provide relief to businesses and residents in Central Massachusetts,” said Mike Kane, Director of Economic Development and Public Policy at the Worcester Regional Chamber of Commerce. “We cannot wait years for hypothetical savings; our employers, residents, and the local economy need real affordability solutions today.”

Another dimension to this legislation is that fails to address the cost burden placed on ratepayers by the Commonwealth’s ambitious renewable energy transition. While Massachusetts is a national leader in the race to decarbonize, common-sense policies that could better allow for an all-of-the-above approach to reducing reliance on fossil fuels were not adequately considered during the writing of the bill or were rejected as amendments during debate.

This includes the rejection of an amendment introduced by Senator Moore that would direct a study of a more realistic implementation of the Advanced Clean Truck Act. The Act directs that an increasing percentage of new medium- and heavy-duty trucks sold in the Commonwealth, including vehicles like delivery trucks and 18-wheeler cargo trucks, must be electric. Industry experts report that the technology and charging infrastructure to fulfill these sales requirements are currently impractical, leading to plans for dealers to sharply cut sales of gas-powered trucks to ensure they remain in compliance with the statistical requirements set by the regulations. The scale of this issue led to Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey in 2025 directing her Department of Environmental Protection to ‘exercise enforcement discretion,’ and delaying sales requirement rules for vehicle model years 2025 and 2026.

Senator Moore and other Senators introduced a number of additional amendments meant to bring immediate relief to ratepayers, including regulating data centers, banning fees for the opt-out of smart meters, reforming MassSave, and more. Most amendments were unsuccessful.

The bill was passed on a roll call vote of 32 – 8. Having passed both chambers of the Legislature, the bill will now go through a reconciliation process to resolve differences before a final version is sent to the Governor.

###

Legislature Finalizes FY27 Budget, Delivers Record Investments Without Raising Taxes

(BOSTON 7/3/2026) — Without raising taxes on Massachusetts residents, the Massachusetts Legislature this week delivered a Fiscal Year 2027 budget that drives down costs for residents, boosts the state's economy, and adds to the state’s savings account.

The plan makes record investments in public education, unlocks new housing production, strengthens the state’s public transportation systems, and protects vulnerable residents from the impact of federal cuts.

The bill spends $63.4 billion, a 4 percent increase from last year, and includes $2.7 billion in Fair Share funds that will support public education and transportation as voters intended. The budget raises no taxes and adds $51 million to the state’s ‘Rainy Day’ Stabilization Fund, which is projected to reach a historic $8.2 billion balance by the end of Fiscal Year 2027.

“Recent years have been defined by an era of uncertainty – uncertainty about our economic prosperity, uncertainty about the direction of our federal government, uncertainty about our future. But here in Massachusetts, we have something we can be certain about; our state-supported programs will remain funded without raising taxes on everyday Bay Staters,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “The record investments in our communities delivered by this FY27 budget is a testament to the responsibility and resilience of our people, and I could not be more thrilled to share the news that Massachusetts will not be leaving anyone behind. I’d like to thank my colleagues in the Legislature for their hard work on this bill, and I look forward to seeing it signed by the Governor.”

During Senate debate, Senator Moore secured amendments for the cities and towns in his district and beyond. They include:

Regional

  • $500,000 for Veterans Inc. to support its employment training and substance use treatment programs.

  • $250,000 to fund cancer screenings for firefighters in cities and towns across the Commonwealth.

  • $250,000 for EcoTarium to support the care of animals, expand community education programs, and fund animal habitat improvements.

  • $25,000 to the Latin American Health Alliance of Central Massachusetts to support its substance use recovery programs.

  • $20,000 for CASA Project Worcester County to support its efforts to provide legal representation to vulnerable children during court proceedings.

Auburn

  • $55,000 for the Town of Auburn to purchase a 3D laser scanner for its Traffic Crash Reconstruction Unit.

  • $20,000 for Auburn Youth and Family Services to support its community food pantry program.

Millbury

  • $75,000 for the Millbury Police Department to purchase a K9 police cruiser.

Grafton

  • $130,000 for Grafton Public Schools to upgrade classroom technology and purchase an activity van (passed as part of the recent Fair Share Supplemental Budget).

Shrewsbury

  • $150,000 for the Shrewsbury Police Department to purchase a police boat for use on Lake Quinsigamond.

Westborough

  • $60,000 for Westborough Public Schools to purchase cell phone lock boxes, creating phone-free classrooms.

Worcester

  • $75,000 for the Worcester Police Department to purchase a K9 police cruiser.

  • $20,000 for the New Americans Community Development Corporation to support the development of affordable housing within Worcester’s Main Middle neighborhood.

 

Education

The agreement completes the Legislature’s commitment to fully fund and implement the Student Opportunity Act with $7.66 billion in Chapter 70 aid to public school districts, an increase of $297 million over Fiscal Year 2026 and the highest level ever, along with a record $160-per-pupil minimum in local school aid.

The budget also revives the Foundation Budget Review Commission (FBRC) to examine the K-12 funding formula and assess how the state can address rising costs in special education, student transportation, personnel, and educator health care statewide.

The agreement funds the Special Education Circuit Breaker at $654.6 million to help students who need support, which, combined with $152 million from the recent Fair Share supplemental budget, brings the total investment to $806.6 million, reimbursing school districts for 75 percent of the costs of educating students with disabilities and complex needs.

Other education investments include $475 million for the Commonwealth Cares for Children (C3) grant program to support early education and care providers’ day-to-day operational and workforce costs, $137 million for the MassEducate and MassReconnect free community college programs, $20 million for rural school districts, and $180 million for universal free school meals, which serve nearly 150 million free meals to Massachusetts kids every year.

The budget also includes $11.7 million to support students receiving special education services through the DESE/DDS Residential Prevention Program, and $2 million for a new grant program helping schools address young people’s social media use.

 

Transportation

The agreement provides $465 million in direct investment for the MBTA, which, combined with $595 million from the recent Fair Share supplemental budget, brings the total new investment in the system to over $1 billion for Fiscal Year 2027. It also includes $217 million for Regional Transit Authorities (RTAs), including $40 million to sustain fare-free transit service statewide. The state’s fare-free Regional Transit program has resulted in ridership exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

The budget also responds to a string of fatal wrong-way driving incidents on Massachusetts highways, including the tragic line-of-duty death of State Trooper Kevin Trainor, by directing MassDOT to implement new infrastructure and officer training, including directional striping, signage, lane delineators, and motorist alert systems.

 

Municipalities and Housing

The agreement provides record support to cities and towns across the state, including $1.363 billion for Unrestricted General Government Aid (UGGA), a $40 million increase over Fiscal Year 2026 and the highest level ever. For new dollars, the legislation implements a new funding formula to equitably distribute the increase throughout all of the state’s 351 communities.

In another step toward addressing the housing crisis and building homes faster statewide, the budget builds on last session’s Affordable Homes Act by streamlining local permitting, supporting development on nonconforming properties, providing reasonable timelines for projects under existing zoning, and modernizing the variance standard, all aimed at boosting housing production and driving down costs.

 

Health Care

The agreement extends the ConnectorCare expansion pilot program through 2027. Since 2024, the pilot has helped more than 115,000 residents access more affordable insurance through lower premiums, no deductibles, and reduced co-pays.

The budget also codifies existing federal protections requiring comprehensive insurance coverage of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) without cost sharing or utilization management barriers and directs a new study to modernize and improve the long-term sustainability of emergency medical services in the Commonwealth.

 

Retiree COLA Reform

This budget includes comprehensive, fiscally prudent reforms to cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) for retired public employees, based on recommendations from the Special COLA Commission. It establishes a COLA Reserve Fund financed in part by pension investment returns above target, provides enhanced COLA benefits for certain current retirees based on years in retirement, and allows the base amount used to calculate future COLAs to increase in $1,000 increments as funding allows.

 

Food and Economic Security

The agreement protects access to benefits through Transitional Aid to Families with Dependent Children (TAFDC) and Emergency Aid to the Elderly, Disabled and Children (EAEDC), and includes a $500 clothing allowance per child for families receiving TAFDC benefits.

It repeals the Learnfare law, which cut off TAFDC benefits when children had too many unexcused school absences and ended up hurting families who lost needed assistance.

It also provides $56.1 million for Emergency Food Assistance, an increase of $6.1 million over Fiscal Year 2026, and $21.5 million for the Healthy Incentives Program (HIP), which supports local farmers and access to healthy food.

 

Protecting Vulnerable Residents

The agreement includes provisions protecting children aged 16 and 17 from sexual interactions with mandated reporters and others responsible for their care and oversight, including teachers, coaches, police officers, and social workers.

In response to the tragic fire at Gabriel House in Fall River, the agreement provides $500,000 to implement recommendations from the Assisted Living Residences (ALR) Commission to improve safety standards, emergency preparedness, and oversight at assisted living facilities statewide.

The budget also establishes a commission to study transitional youth services for individuals with disabilities whose access to special education services will end due to high school graduation or turning 22, as the Legislature works to preserve community-based care options amid federal challenges to the Olmstead decision.

 

Sports Wagering Revenue

The agreement adjusts the distribution of sports wagering revenue, directing 5.5 percent to the Sports and Entertainment Fund and 2 percent to the Economic Development Trust Fund, dedicating new resources to support the Commonwealth’s economic growth.

 

The full text of the Fiscal Year 2027 budget is available online.

Having been passed by the Legislature, the bill has been sent to Governor Healey for her signature.

###

Legislature Raises Worcester Police Recruiting Age of Eligibility

(BOSTON 6/30/2026) — Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey today signed a home rule petition raising the maximum age of eligibility to begin the process of becoming a Worcester Police Officer from 32 years of age or younger to 39 years of age or younger. The bill, unanimously approved by the Worcester City Council in November 2024, was shepherded through the Legislature by Senator Michael Moore and Representative James O’Day.

Previously, a recruit over the age of 32 on the date of their entrance examination was ineligible to have their name certified for appointment to the position of police officer within the City of Worcester. With the enactment of H.3929, the cutoff is raised to those over the age of 39. Individuals with military service are given an additional three years to begin the process of becoming an officer under both the old and new ages of eligibility.

In recent years, the City of Worcester has struggled to recruit enough qualified candidates training to become police officers, falling from 1,200 to 1,500 potential recruits per year in the past to 200 to 250 more recently. City officials say that this law will increase the number of eligible candidates and help the Worcester Police Department better serve the city.

“I was proud to work with the City of Worcester and Representative O’Day to get this home rule petition across the finish line. This minor change to the Worcester Police’s age of eligibility guidelines will expand the pool of qualified individuals to recruit from without sacrificing the safety or security of Worcester’s neighborhoods,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “The people of Worcester deserve to feel safe in their communities. By passing this law, we are reaffirming our commitment to supporting our police and the city they serve.”

“As the lead sponsor of this bill, I worked closely with my colleagues in the House, Senator Moore, and Senator Kennedy to successfully advance the proposal through the legislative process,” said Representative James O’Day (D-Worcester). “At a time when police departments across the Commonwealth are working to recruit and retain qualified officers, Worcester should have all the available resources and tools necessary to attract strong candidates and keep our neighborhoods safe. I'm pleased that the city's request has been laid before the Governor for final passage, and I'm confident that this measure will improve public safety going forward"

"I want to thank Senator Moore and our state delegation for their partnership in passing H.3929,” said Worcester Mayor Joe Petty. “By expanding the eligibility age, we will welcome a broader pool of dedicated recruits who bring valuable life and professional experience to the Worcester Police Department.”

“The passing of this bill will have a profound impact on the Worcester Police Department’s ability to recruit more officers,” said Worcester City Manager Eric Batista. “With officers retiring, officers on long-term disability, and officers deployed in the military, this recruiting age increase will help us fill these vacancies and ensure we’re able to provide the level of public safety service our residents deserve. Thank you to Senator Moore and Rep. O’Day for their advocacy and support with pushing this bill forward.”

Changing the maximum age to begin the process of becoming a police officer to 39 aligns Worcester with cities and towns throughout the Commonwealth, including Boston, Plymouth, and Taunton.

After its passage by the Worcester City Council on November 12th, 2024 in a 11-0 vote, the home rule petition was filed in the Legislature on March 20th, 2025. With Representative O’Day as its House sponsor, it was passed in the House on May 26th, 2026, with passage through the Senate on June 18th led by Senator Moore as its Senate sponsor.

Having been signed by the Governor, the bill is now law.

###

Senate Passes Bill Expanding Primary Care Access

(BOSTON 6/22/2026) — The Massachusetts Senate last week overwhelmingly passed a landmark bill to invest in primary care and make it easier for Massachusetts residents to get a primary care appointment.

The legislation simplifies finding a primary care clinician, reduces the amount of time providers have to spend on administrative paperwork, and aims to reduce health care costs.

Currently, 43% of Massachusetts residents have difficulty accessing primary care. Studies show that 40% of emergency room visits in Massachusetts could have been prevented if treated in a primary care setting.

The legislation – S.3116, An Act relative to primary care for you – requires health care providers and insurers to invest more heavily in primary care services. Additionally, it ensures fairer compensation for community health centers, which serve as the frontline of primary care for many residents, and grows Massachusetts’ primary care workforce by unlocking matching federal funds to train and recruit more primary care doctors.

During Senate debate, Second Worcester District Senator Michael Moore secured an amendment updating the bill’s language to recognize nurse practitioners as primary care providers – meeting the reality in both current Massachusetts law and in doctor’s offices across the Commonwealth. Amendment 62 ensures that the broad changes made by the legislation apply equally to all primary care providers Bay Staters already see.

“People are struggling to access basic healthcare across Massachusetts. This legislation makes real changes to our care and our insurance systems to help ensure that everyone can find a primary care provider who can support their overall wellness and treat issues before they turn into lifelong conditions,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “By requiring greater spending on primary care services, increasing funding to community health centers, and investing in our healthcare workforce, this bill will allow more people to get care than ever before. And thanks to my amendment, these changes will encompass all the different types of primary care providers that people already know and trust, including nurse practitioners. I’m pleased that the Senate is taking these important steps, and I hope that the House will join us to get this to the Governor’s desk.”

This key health policy bill would create a more robust health care system in Massachusetts by requiring providers and insurers to invest a certain level of their annual spending on primary care services.

In recent years, investment has surged in profitable ‘specialty care’ areas while only 6.7% of total health care spending in Massachusetts has been on primary care. The resulting scarcity of available primary care doctors has left many residents searching for crucial basic, preventive care.

Health care entities would now have to meet a new mandated level of primary care investment which would gradually step up to 15%. The requirements would be overseen and enforced by the Health Policy Commission (HPC).

The bill also lifts up one of the main settings where many Massachusetts residents access their primary care – community health centers (CHCs), which have been disadvantaged by receiving lower reimbursements than other providers. This legislation calls for fairness and sets dependable rates for CHCs by requiring commercial insurers to reimburse at least the same rates that MassHealth reimburses for the same services.

The Senate’s proposal also doubles down on recent efforts to grow the size of the primary care workforce in Massachusetts. It would re-establish a Medicaid graduate medical education (GME) program, which the state can use to take advantage of matching federal funds to help cover the costs of fellowships and residency programs. When fully scaled up, the program would fund dozens of positions and help draw more primary care providers to Massachusetts in community-based settings.

This builds on a Senate-led initiative that was signed into law earlier this month to address the shortage of primary care doctors by funding scholarships for UMass Chan Medical School students who pursue family medicine and pledge to practice in underserved communities in Massachusetts after they graduate.

Full details of this legislation are included in a fact sheet in the Senate press room.

Senators proposed 72 amendments to the bill. During the course of the public debate, the Senate adopted a significant amendment to ensure access to timely and effective treatment for people with serious mental illness. The amendment (Amendment 64) eliminates prior authorization for medication to treat serious mental illness, keeping decisions between providers and patients.

People with serious mental illness often have to try multiple combinations of medications in an effort to find the right treatment. Delays due to prior authorization can impede their ability to effectively treat their disease. Feedback on that amendment was solicited last year at a public hearing by the Joint Committee on Financial Services. It was also recommended by the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing and was further reviewed by the Senate Committee on Ways and Means.

The Senate passed the bill on a 35-4 roll call vote and sent it to the House of Representatives for further review.

###

203 Legislators Announce Opposition to Proposed AI Regulation Moratorium Policy

(BOSTON 6/17/2026) — Yesterday, 203 legislators from 42 states sent a letter to lawmakers in Washington DC urging them to reject a policy proposal contained within the draft Great American AI Act (GAAIA) which would preempt certain state-level regulations on artificial intelligence technologies for three years. The provision, contained within a preliminary discussion draft released in early June by Congressman Jay Obernolte (R-CA) and Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA), would broadly eliminate any state’s ability to write or enforce laws regulating the development of any AI model.

An effort led by Massachusetts State Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury) and Ohio State Senator Louis Blessing (R-Colerain), and in collaboration with Americans for Responsible Innovation (ARI), the letter warns against overriding state laws governing the development of AI models without first creating comprehensive federal protections against abuses by multi-trillion-dollar tech companies. The types of state laws this bill would preempt, the letter states, “would include measures addressing the AI models trained on copyrighted works or child abuse content, legislation ensuring that AI is not developed in a way that discriminates against workers or homebuyers, and state bills that protect the privacy of consumers.”

Made up of 104 Democrats, 98 Republicans, and 1 Independent, the group of lawmakers further warn, “not only is the provision extremely broad as written, but the tech industry will almost certainly weaponize such a provision in court to strike down state measures not intended to fall within the scope of GAAIA.”

“This is the fourth time in just over a year that Congress and President Trump have attempted to preempt our authority on this issue. I simply do not understand DC’s obsession with stripping power away from the states when it comes to protecting everyday people from the downsides of artificial intelligence,” said Senator Michael Moore. “There are real and pressing questions about how AI models are developed, including what content they should be allowed to train on and how the human creators of that content should be compensated. While AI may hold the potential to revolutionize the way we live and work for the better at some hazy point in the future, the dangers of it taking hardworking people’s jobs, producing harmful photos and videos, and discriminating against already-marginalized communities are here and now. Unless Congress is going to work with state lawmakers to roll out a set of comprehensive federal protections for average Americans, this is nothing more than a giveaway to billionaire and trillionaire tech oligarchs like Sam Altman and Elon Musk. It’s time to stand up to Big Tech and remind them that they are responsible for the things they make and how they affect society – I urge DC to once again reject this misguided policy proposal.”

This is not the first time big tech companies have attempted to enact an AI regulation moratorium – last summer, congressional Republicans attempted to slip a 10-year regulation pre-emption into the 1,000+ page so-called ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’. After AITIC members urged opposition to that misguided policy, Senator Ed Markey led an effort to strip the language from the US Senate’s version in a 99-1 vote. Similarly, the artificial intelligence industry tried to insert another moratorium into the must-pass National Defense Authorization Act, but once again the provision was dropped. And again in December, President Trump signed a constitutionally questionable executive order directing his Attorney General to establish an AI Litigation Task Force whose sole purpose will be to challenge state-level AI regulations in court. It also directs federal agencies to identify “burdensome” state AI regulations and withhold funding for projects such as rural broadband expansion unless states commit to dropping the laws. Challenges to this order are currently being heard in the courts.

While President Trump in 2025 signed into law the Take It Down Act, a bill criminalizing the sharing of AI-generated revenge porn, there are currently no comprehensive regulations or legislation on the development or use of artificial intelligence at the federal level in the United States. In the regulatory void this inaction has created, states have stepped in to put up guardrails around this emerging technology. The Massachusetts Legislature is currently considering bills that regulate the use of AI in health insurance coverage decision making, in evaluating employee performance, in the spreading of election disinformation, and more. Further, state governments have been acting faster to protect residents than federal government has – Massachusetts enacted a bill similar to the Take It Down Act almost a year before the US Government did.

The letter urges DC lawmakers to consider the wide-ranging societal consequences of their light-touch approach on technology companies in the past; “the lessons of the social media era are clear: allowing Silicon Valley to write its own rulebook leaves industry unaccountable and leaves American families vulnerable to AI’s dangers.”

In closing, the bipartisan group of lawmakers “respectfully urge [Congress] to reject GAAIA’s preemption proposal overriding state AI legislation and to support the development of, rather than the dismantling of, responsible AI policy.”

The letter is addressed to the U.S. House of Representatives and the United States Senate. It was organized and written in partnership with Americans for Responsible Innovation, a non-profit organization that advocates for technology policy in the public interest, with a focus on AI and related tech.

The full letter can be found online here.

###

Legislature Creates Permanent ‘Blue Envelope’ Program Supporting People with Autism

(BOSTON 6/16/2026) — The Massachusetts Legislature yesterday passed legislation establishing a statewide ‘blue envelope’ program, giving motorists with autism spectrum disorder a simple, recognizable way to alert police officers to their diagnosis and help guide the interaction before it escalates. The bill – S.2565, An Act facilitating better interactions between police officers and persons with autism spectrum disorder – effectively makes permanent a Massachusetts State Police pilot created last year after a similar program was proposed by the Legislature.

The easily recognizable envelopes can be handed over during a traffic stop by an individual with autism whose ability to communicate is likely to be negatively affected by a stressful situation.

The outside of the blue envelope prominently notes that the person has autism spectrum disorder (ASD), along with guidance on how to effectively interact with them, while the inside features places to store their driver’s license and auto registration.

During Senate debate, Senator Michael Moore introduced an amendment requiring law enforcement officers to complete training every five years on how the blue envelope program works and how to best interact with individuals with autism. The amendment was adopted unanimously, and the amendment language was retained in the final bill passed by both chambers.

“People on the autism spectrum can face unique challenges during stressful situations, such as traffic stops. The Blue Envelope program will help officers instantly understand if a driver might require a different approach, and my amendment will ensure that all law enforcement officials in the Commonwealth have the training they need to better understand these individuals, with training refreshers every five years,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “Policies like these help keep everyone on the road safer. I’m hopeful that the blue envelope program will be written into law this year so that we can further cement our commitment to making the Commonwealth more accessible for all.”

The Registry of Motor Vehicles (RMV) would be responsible for making the envelopes available to people with ASD or their parents or guardians.

The House of Representatives and the Senate each enacted the bill yesterday, sending it to the Governor for her signature.

###

Massachusetts Senate Passes Landmark Child Welfare Bill

(BOSTON 6/12/2026) — The Massachusetts Senate yesterday unanimously passed legislation that safeguards the wellbeing of children, particularly those in state care and foster care; increases access to community support for children at risk of court involvement; and strengthens investigations of abuse cases. It also expands the Commonwealth’s vision screening programs in public schools across the state to ensure follow-up care if a problem is identified.

By establishing a Foster Child Bill of Rights, the bill – S.3111, An Act enhancing child welfare protections – guarantees certain basic rights for children in foster care related to their safety, education, and health care.

This legislation also expands the diversion of children dealing with behavior or attendance problems to Family Resource Centers (FRCs) instead of the court system.

FRCs provide accessible, confidential support to children and families in crisis close to home and have proven successful in helping kids and teens stay in school, connecting families with services such as mental health or substance use treatment, housing aid, and legal help, and—most importantly—avoiding the need for the child to obtain a court record just to access assistance.

The bill further strengthens the Office of the Child Advocate (OCA) to support robust investigations into reports of harm or abuse to a child. It places the Child Fatality Review Team within the OCA and explicitly empowers the OCA to review cases of indecent assault and battery, abuse or rape of a child.

During debate, the Senate adopted Amendment 28, introduced by Second Worcester District Senator Michael Moore, which creates a computerized registry of children’s vision screenings and eye care results to ensure abnormal results are followed up on. The registry is set to include information on screening results, whether referrals for additional eye examinations are made, and what follow-up care is administered. This is the primary recommendation made by the 2021 Report of the Childhood Vision and Eye Health Commission, and the cornerstone of Senator Moore’s comprehensive children’s eye care bill, S.166. Approximately 10% of all preschool children have eye or vision problems, and given that research shows that 90% of all information processed by the brain arrives through the visual system, unaddressed vision challenges at a young age can risk a child missing out on critical developmental years.

“We owe it to the children of Massachusetts to ensure they receive the very best care and are protected by the full force of our laws. This bill makes very real changes to advance the safety and protection for children in our foster care system and beyond,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “I’m also thrilled that the Senate joined me in support of my amendment which makes an important change to the Commonwealth’s youth vision screening system, creating a computerized registry to ensure children who need additional eye care get it. I’ve been advocating for this policy for a long time, and I’m so proud that our system will no longer allow children with vision challenges to fall through the cracks – giving the next generation of Bay Staters the best chance to thrive in school and throughout their lives.”

Full details of the legislation are included in a fact sheet in the Senate’s press room.

During the course of public debate during today’s formal session, Senators adopted amendments to further strengthen the OCA’s work to serve children and families.

One addition to the bill (Amendment 1) requires the OCA to make materials available to volunteers who work with children—such as volunteer coaches or scout troop leaders—that will help them recognize the signs of child abuse, prevent sexual abuse, and understand signs of problematic sexual behavior between minors.

Senators also adopted another amendment (Amendment 31), inspired by a family’s story, to ask the OCA to compile resources to better aid grieving families who have lost a child due to Sudden Unexplained Death Syndrome (SUDS).

The Senate passed the bill yesterday on a 39-0 roll call vote and sent it back to the House for further review.

###

Massachusetts Legislature Sets 2026 Sales Tax-Free Weekend for August 8th and 9th

(BOSTON 6/12/2026) — The Massachusetts Legislature yesterday set Saturday, August 8 and Sunday, August 9 as the official dates of Massachusetts’ annual sales tax holiday.

During the holiday, the state’s 6.25 percent sales tax will be suspended for most retail items priced under $2,500. 

“Families across the Commonwealth are feeling the squeeze as the cost of everything – from day-to-day purchases to rare splurges – rises,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “I’m thrilled to share that Massachusetts’ annual sales tax holiday has been set for August 8th and 9th, giving Bay Staters the opportunity to pick up that new gadget, buy some gifts, or stock up on their essentials for less. I’d like to thank my colleagues in the Legislature for getting this done to provide relief for our people and boost our economy.”

A spike in consumer activity routinely boosts indirect tax revenues. According to the Department of Revenue, the 2025 sales tax holiday generated $3.65 million in indirect tax revenues due to increased economic activity. 

At a time when consumers are seeing prices on store shelves rise, driven in part by federally imposed tariffs, this year’s Massachusetts sales tax holiday will give shoppers a much-needed break. The holiday also encourages families looking to shop for back-to-school season to support local small businesses and retailers. 

Information about eligible purchases is available on the Department of Revenue website. 

###

Massachusetts Legislature Sets 2026 Sales Tax-Free Weekend for August 8th and 9th

(BOSTON 6/11/2026) — The Massachusetts Legislature today set Saturday, August 8 and Sunday, August 9 as the official dates of Massachusetts’ annual sales tax holiday.

During the holiday, the state’s 6.25 percent sales tax will be suspended for most retail items priced under $2,500. 

“Families across the Commonwealth are feeling the squeeze as the cost of everything – from day-to-day purchases to rare splurges – rises,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “I’m thrilled to share that Massachusetts’ annual sales tax holiday has been set for August 8th and 9th, giving Bay Staters the opportunity to pick up that new gadget, buy some gifts, or stock up on their essentials for less. I’d like to thank my colleagues in the Legislature for getting this done to provide relief for our people and boost our economy.”

A spike in consumer activity routinely boosts indirect tax revenues. According to the Department of Revenue, the 2025 sales tax holiday generated $3.65 million in indirect tax revenues due to increased economic activity. 

At a time when consumers are seeing prices on store shelves rise, driven in part by federally imposed tariffs, this year’s Massachusetts sales tax holiday will give shoppers a much-needed break. The holiday also encourages families looking to shop for back-to-school season to support local small businesses and retailers. 

Information about eligible purchases is available on the Department of Revenue website. 

###

Senate Votes to Ban Cancer-Linked Chemicals from IV Bags in Massachusetts

(BOSTON 6/9/2026) — Use of a toxic chemical which is commonly added to plastic intravenous bags and linked to cancer cases would be banned in Massachusetts under a bill advanced last week by the Massachusetts Senate.

Senators voted to pass the bill, which would phase out the use of DEHP – a toxic chemical – in IV bags and tubing in Massachusetts. Many IV bags currently contain DEHP, which is added to improve the plastic’s flexibility but can pose serious health dangers to patients.

“When you go to a hospital or doctors’ office, you’d expect that all the tools, devices, and materials they use would be manufactured with the health and safety of the patient in mind,” said Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury). “The science is in, and it’s time to take action to ban the use of DEHP, a carcinogen, in sensitive medical products like IVs. I’m pleased that the Senate has acted on this issue to help build trust between patients and our medical system, and I look forward to getting this bill to Governor Healey’s desk.”

The legislation – S.3106, An Act relative to toxic-free medical devices – would prohibit the manufacture or sale of IV containers and tubing made with intentionally added DEHP. DEHP, Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, has been linked to breast, liver, lung, and testicular cancer, according to Breast Cancer Prevention Partners.

Full details of the legislation are available in a fact sheet in the Senate’s press room.

The Senate passed the bill and sent it to the House of Representatives for further review.

###